Nitrate

Why there is still nitrate in England’s water.

England has had a nitrate law since 1991 and has designated 55 per cent of its land a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone since 2002. Agriculture still accounts for around 60 per cent of the nitrogen reaching rivers in England and Wales. This is why regulation at the point of application has not closed the gap, and what would.

The Soil First Initiative  ·  every figure sourced and linked
Lush green fields and farmland seen from the air
Farmland is where the nitrate starts

The scale of it

Nitrate is the most heavily regulated pollutant in English farming, and it is still the one we cannot get out of the water.

  • Around 60 per cent of the nitrogen in rivers in England and Wales comes from agriculture.1
  • 55 per cent of England is designated a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone, with mandatory rules on when and how much nitrogen can be applied.2
  • Agriculture adversely affects 40 per cent of England’s water bodies.1
  • Only 41 per cent of groundwater bodies are in good condition, and groundwater is where a great deal of drinking water is drawn from.3

Why the rules have not fixed it

Almost every nitrate rule in England governs the moment of application. How much you may apply, when you may apply it, how close to a watercourse, on what slope, into what soil condition. These are sensible rules and they are worth keeping.

But nitrate does not leave a field at the moment of application. It leaves months later, dissolved in water, moving down through the profile or across the surface. What decides whether it leaves is not the rule. It is whether the soil could hold on to it in the meantime.

Nitrate is highly soluble and carries a negative charge, so unlike phosphate or potassium it is barely held by soil minerals at all. What holds it is living soil: organic matter, root mass and the microbial biomass that takes mineral nitrogen up and locks it into organic forms until a crop needs it. A global meta-analysis of organic inputs found exactly this effect, with carbon rich amendments promoting the conversion of mineral nitrogen into organic forms and reducing leaching and run-off losses.4

England’s arable soils have already lost between 40 and 60 per cent of their organic carbon.5 We have spent thirty-five years regulating what goes on to soil that has progressively lost its ability to keep hold of it.

Twelve years of advice, four per cent

Catchment Sensitive Farming has been the government’s flagship response since 2006. Natural England’s own evaluation of phases one to four, covering 2006 to 2018, recorded nitrogen down 4 per cent in the catchments where it operated.6

Meanwhile the Environment Agency inspected 15,006 farms between April 2021 and March 2026 and found 48 per cent non-compliant, a rate that has barely moved in five years: 52, 49, 50, 49 and then 43 per cent.1

What it costs to take back out

Every kilo of nitrogen that leaves a field has to be removed again downstream, in a plant that has to be built, powered and paid for every year the load keeps arriving.

  • Anglian Water has invested around £100 million in equipment for groundwater sources with high nitrate.7
  • Wessex Water built a nitrate removal plant at Poole for £12 million, costing nearly £1 million a year to run.7
  • Southern Water has reported treatment costs of £700,000 to £800,000 per million litres to bring nitrate down to drinking water standards.7

None of that cost appears on a farm invoice, and none of it is recoverable. It is paid by bill payers for as long as the load keeps arriving.

To be clear

Tap water in England is treated to standard and is safe to drink. The problem is not that treatment fails. It is that treatment is the most expensive possible place to solve a problem that begins in a field, and it has to be paid for again every single year.

What would actually change it

If nitrate leaves because the soil cannot hold it, then the durable fix is to restore the soil’s ability to hold it. That means organic matter, root depth and biological activity, built back over years rather than applied in a season.

It also means the change has to pay for itself on the farm, because thirty-five years of evidence says voluntary advice moves the needle by single digits and enforcement produced 36 prosecutions in five years.1 A soil that holds its own nitrogen needs less bought in, and that is the only version of this that a farm business will sustain without being paid to do it.

What we do about it

The Soil First Initiative works on the soil itself, using natural soil biology to build structure and organic matter so farmland holds rain and nutrients instead of shedding them. It is done field by field and catchment by catchment, the land stays in full production throughout, and the change is measured in the soil and in the water. See how it works, or read the full evidence file.

Sources
1 Defra and Environment Agency, “Agriculture and the water environment: 2026 report”. gov.uk
2 Defra, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones. gov.uk
3 Environment Agency and Defra, “New data to drive action to improve England’s rivers and lakes”, 6 August 2026. gov.uk
4 “Organic inputs to reduce nitrogen export via leaching and run-off: a global meta-analysis”, Science of the Total Environment. sciencedirect.com
5 Environment Agency, “The state of the environment: soil”, June 2019. gov.uk
6 Natural England, Catchment Sensitive Farming Evaluation Report, water quality phases 1 to 4 (2006 to 2018), NE731. naturalengland.org.uk
7 “Nitrate problems are soluble, but who pays?”, edie. edie.net
Keep reading

Related